sneerpiece:

huskerdont:

dontcookbilly:

halphillips:

WikiLeaks says that Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction and that everything Bush said was true.

I did not expect that.

(Fairly certain I still oppose the war.)

well…lets see how this gets covered

If the article is correct, probably not at all. Do you think any major media outlet not owned by Rupert Murdoch is going to say, “Hey, turns out that whole going into Iraq thing might have actually had some merit. Sorry we were so hard on you, George.”?

ohmigod.  i feel so vindicated. 

Is it me, or is that whole pathetic, spluttering article predicated on one phrase, in a secondary source, whose context belied the entire context of the rest of the article?

Let me put it another way: bullshit!